Enterprise Strategy Group | Getting to the bigger truth.TM

Heterogeneous Server Virtualization

Hats off to VMware for its leadership in server virtualization. That said, I am hearing more and more stories about heterogeneous server virtualization in large organizations.

Does this mean that VMware is faltering? No. As virtualization has gone from cutting edge to mainstream, however, IT organizations are gaining virtualization experience, testing other platforms, and finding good fits for KVM, Microsoft, Oracle, and XenServer–alongside VMware.

At the beginning of 2010, ESG Research asked 345 mid-market (i.e.,  less than 1,000 employees) and enterprise (i.e., more than 1,000 employees) firms which server virtualization solutions were currently deployed at their organizations.  The data supports the scuttlebutt I heard on my recent travels:

  • VMware Server 38%
  • Microsoft Virtual Server 36%
  • VMware ESX: 32%
  • Citrix XenServer 30%
  • VMware ESXi: 18%
  • Oracle VM 19%
  • Microsoft Hyper-V: 17%
  • Sun xVM Server: 10%
  • KVM: 9%

Based on anecdotal evidence, I don’t think this is a phase–it looks like multiple server virtualization platforms in the enterprise is the future. What does this mean?

  1. Server virtualization will get more complex. IT will need specialization on multiple platforms.
  2. Vendors need to pick multiple dance partners. VMware is clearly a safe bet but IT infrastructure and tools vendors need to think beyond VMware alone. Microsoft and Citrix will likely recruit partners with an endpoint focus while KVM and Oracle will be more of a data center play.
  3. Services opportunities abound. IT complexity and skills deficits are on the horizon. Services vendors that can bridge these gaps will prosper in 2011 and 2012.

Related posts:

  1. Get Ready for Multiple Virtualization Platforms
  2. Cloud Computing? We Still Haven’t Mastered Server Virtualization!
  3. Server Virtualization Security: A Lot More Work Is Needed
  4. Networking and Virtualization Vendors Should Join the Open vSwitch Effort
  5. People May Be the Weakest Link in the Server Virtualization Chain

Tags: , , , KVM, , , , XenServer

All views and opinions expressed in ESG blog posts are intended to be those of the post's author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc., or its clients. ESG bloggers do not and will not engage in any form of paid-for blogging. Click to see our complete Disclosure Policy.

One Response to “Heterogeneous Server Virtualization”

  1. I run into situations where there are multiple hypervisors in use at buyers and customers. Most frequently, what I see is production use of VMware ESX or licensed ESXi coupled with Hyper-V server.

    The crippling that VMware does of “free” ESXi is giving Hyper-V Server an opening. I wrote more on how I perceive VMware is shooting itself in the foot at http://www.unitrends.com/weblog/index.php/2010/06/07/why-vmware-is-committing-suicide-whistling-past-the-graveyard/

    Reply

Add a comment

Search
© 2010 Enterprise Strategy Group, Milford, MA 01757 Main: Fax:

Switch to our mobile site