Hats off to VMware for its leadership in server virtualization. That said, I am hearing more and more stories about heterogeneous server virtualization in large organizations.
Does this mean that VMware is faltering? No. As virtualization has gone from cutting edge to mainstream, however, IT organizations are gaining virtualization experience, testing other platforms, and finding good fits for KVM, Microsoft, Oracle, and XenServer–alongside VMware.
At the beginning of 2010, ESG Research asked 345 mid-market (i.e., less than 1,000 employees) and enterprise (i.e., more than 1,000 employees) firms which server virtualization solutions were currently deployed at their organizations. The data supports the scuttlebutt I heard on my recent travels:
Based on anecdotal evidence, I don’t think this is a phase–it looks like multiple server virtualization platforms in the enterprise is the future. What does this mean?
Related posts:
Tags: Citrix, ESX, Hyper-V, KVM, Microsoft, Oracle, VMware, XenServer
I run into situations where there are multiple hypervisors in use at buyers and customers. Most frequently, what I see is production use of VMware ESX or licensed ESXi coupled with Hyper-V server.
The crippling that VMware does of “free” ESXi is giving Hyper-V Server an opening. I wrote more on how I perceive VMware is shooting itself in the foot at http://www.unitrends.com/weblog/index.php/2010/06/07/why-vmware-is-committing-suicide-whistling-past-the-graveyard/
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
Your email: